Skip to content
NomadQualify

Digital Nomad Visas That Accept Savings Instead of Income

Last updated July 21, 2026.

Quick answer

A handful of programs let you qualify with a lump-sum bank balance instead of a monthly salary. Thailand's DTV asks for 500,000 THB in savings and no income at all, Brazil accepts 18,000 US dollars in the bank as an alternative to its 1,500-a-month floor, Mexico lets you use a large savings or investment balance in place of income, and Croatia takes proof of savings covering your whole stay.

Most digital nomad visas ask for a monthly income you have to prove month after month, which is a problem if your earnings are lumpy, you are between contracts, or your wealth sits in the bank rather than in a payslip. A smaller set of programs solves this by accepting a savings balance instead: show enough money in the account and the monthly-income test falls away. It is the route of choice for freelancers with irregular billing, business owners with retained earnings, and anyone who has capital but not a steady salary.

See every visa you qualify for on your income

Enter your income and passport once — get your ranked shortlist in about 30 seconds. Free, no signup.

Check my eligibility →

How the savings route actually works

The savings route replaces "prove you earn X per month" with "prove you hold Y in the bank." In practice consulates want more than a single-day snapshot. Thailand asks to see the balance maintained across the previous three months; Mexico looks at an average balance over twelve months; Croatia wants proof the funds cover your whole intended stay. The money almost always has to be liquid cash in a bank. Mexico explicitly rejects crypto, precious metals, and real estate, wanting to see actual deposits sitting in an account.

The funds usually do not have to sit in a local bank; a statement from your home-country bank in a major currency is normally fine, converted to the threshold on the statement date. And in most programs the balance is checked at application, not policed afterwards. Thailand's DTV, for instance, does not require you to keep 500,000 THB parked once the visa is granted. Read each program's rule, though, because a few do want the balance held throughout the stay.

  • Balance is judged over a period (three to twelve months), not a single day, in most programs.
  • Liquid cash only in the strict cases; Mexico rejects crypto, metals, and property.
  • Foreign-bank statements in a major currency are generally accepted.

The main savings-route programs

Thailand's DTV is the cleanest example: 500,000 THB in savings, no income requirement at all, in exchange for a five-year, multiple-entry visa that grants 180 days per entry. Brazil runs an explicit either/or; you qualify with 1,500 US dollars a month in income or 18,000 US dollars sitting in the bank, and either one satisfies the same VITEM XIV nomad visa. Both are aimed at people whose bank balance tells a stronger story than their income statement.

Mexico's economic-solvency route is the heavyweight. You can qualify for temporary residency with a large savings or investment balance, commonly cited around 73,000 US dollars and held for the prior twelve months, as an alternative to roughly 4,400 US dollars a month in income. The exact figure is pegged to a multiple of Mexico's UMA in pesos and rises every January, and consulates apply real discretion over how they read it. Croatia sits between the two worlds: instead of about 3,622 euros a month, you can show savings of roughly 43,470 euros to cover a twelve-month stay or 65,205 euros for the full eighteen months.

  • Thailand DTV: 500,000 THB in savings, no income test, five-year validity.
  • Brazil: 18,000 US dollars in the bank OR 1,500 US dollars/month income (either/or).
  • Mexico: a large savings or investment balance (pegged to the UMA, rises yearly) instead of about 4,400/month.
  • Croatia: about 43,470 euros (12 months) or 65,205 euros (18 months) in savings instead of monthly income.

Pros and cons of the savings route

The upside is flexibility. If your income arrives in unpredictable chunks, a lump sum sidesteps the awkward conversation about why last month looked thin. It suits founders who leave earnings inside a company, people between roles, and anyone whose real financial strength is a balance rather than a wage. It can also be faster to document: one set of statements instead of a year of matched invoices.

The cost is that you have to actually have the capital, and often keep it liquid and idle during the review. Savings thresholds are usually far larger than a single month of income, so the route favours the already-wealthy over the merely well-paid. Consulate discretion is real, especially in Mexico, where one office may want the minimum present on every day of the period and another only the month-end balance. And where dependants are added, the requirement multiplies; Thailand adds another 500,000 THB per person, so a family can need a substantial pool.

  • Pros: works for irregular income, founders, and career gaps; often simpler paperwork.
  • Cons: large capital locked up, consulate discretion, and per-dependant multipliers.

Savings or income: which route to pick

If you draw a steady salary that clears the threshold, the income route is almost always simpler and cheaper; you already have the payslips. The savings route earns its keep when your income is real but hard to present cleanly: variable freelance billing, a business that pays you irregularly, or a recent job change. Before you commit, check whether your target country even offers a savings alternative, since most European programs beyond Croatia still insist on monthly income, and match the route to the shape of your money rather than to a headline number.

Savings route vs income route across the main programs (native figures where set that way)
CountrySavings routeIncome routeNote
Thailand (DTV)500,000 THB, held ~3 monthsNone required5-year multi-entry; 180 days per entry
Brazil18,000 USD in the bankor 1,500 USD/monthEither/or; 1 year, renewable
MexicoLarge balance (~73,000 USD, pegged to UMA)or ~4,400 USD/monthCash only; consulate discretion
Croatia~43,470 EUR (12 mo) / 65,205 EUR (18 mo)or ~3,622 EUR/monthForeign income is tax-free

Countries this applies to

FAQ

Which digital nomad visas accept savings instead of income?
The clearest are Thailand's DTV (500,000 THB, no income test), Brazil (18,000 US dollars as an alternative to 1,500 a month), Mexico's economic-solvency route (a large balance instead of monthly income), and Croatia (savings covering the full stay). Most European programs beyond Croatia still require monthly income.
How much savings do I need for Thailand's DTV?
500,000 THB in liquid funds, shown on personal bank statements for roughly the previous three months. It does not have to be in a Thai bank or in baht; an equivalent balance in USD, EUR, or GBP is accepted. After approval, you are not required to keep the money parked.
Can I use Brazil's nomad visa with savings and no salary?
Yes. Brazil's VITEM XIV is an explicit either/or: you qualify with 1,500 US dollars a month in income or 18,000 US dollars in the bank. Meeting either one is enough, so applicants with capital but irregular income can rely on the savings figure alone.
Does Mexico accept crypto or property as savings?
No. Mexican consulates want liquid cash held in bank or investment accounts and explicitly reject bitcoin, precious metals, and real estate as proof of economic solvency. They also expect to see the balance sustained over the prior twelve months, not just present on the day you apply.
Do I have to keep the money in the bank after I am approved?
Usually not. Most savings-route programs check the balance at application only; Thailand's DTV is a clear example. But rules vary, and a few consulates, notably in Mexico, may want the minimum sustained across the qualifying period. Always confirm the specific program's wording before moving funds.
Is the savings route harder than the income route?
It is different rather than uniformly harder. The paperwork can be simpler, one set of statements instead of a year of matched invoices, but the thresholds are much larger and consulate discretion is greater. If you have a steady qualifying salary, the income route is usually the easier and cheaper path.

Sources

Every income threshold, duration, fee, and rule on this page traces to an official government or consulate source. Last verified July 21, 2026.

See our verification methodology and themaster source list.

Last verified July 21, 2026Reviewed by the NomadQualify Editorial Team against the official immigration source.

Related guides